UI UX

PanaGhar — A Book Rental Model Built Around How People Actually Read

PanaGhar — A Book Rental Model Built Around How People Actually Read

PanaGhar — A Book Rental Model Built Around How People Actually Read

A deposit-based book rental system, priced around real reading pace instead of a library's weekly or annual fee — with an auto-deduction mechanism that makes trust enforced, not hoped for.

View on Figma

View on Figma

View Live

View Live

Duration

Sep-Nov, 2024

Organization


GCES

Created on

Updated on

The problem: Nepal's book rental options are a weekly library rate (200–500 NPR) or an annual membership (~1,000 NPR) — neither fits how people actually read.

"Most people, myself included, don't finish a book in a week — that's skimming, not reading."

The model: A deposit (200–250 NPR) that decreases ~50 NPR per week held — a month of reading costs close to what a library charges for one week, and lets people earn from unused books on their own shelves.

The trust mechanism: Registration and a status page raise the cost of a throwaway account — but the real fix is renters linking a bank account so the remaining deposit auto-deducts if a book isn't returned. Trust isn't hoped for; it's enforced by the system itself.

Where it stands: Live and hosted, but not yet fully functional. Content redesign planned next.

The problem: Nepal's book rental options are a weekly library rate (200–500 NPR) or an annual membership (~1,000 NPR) — neither fits how people actually read.

"Most people, myself included, don't finish a book in a week — that's skimming, not reading."

The model: A deposit (200–250 NPR) that decreases ~50 NPR per week held — a month of reading costs close to what a library charges for one week, and lets people earn from unused books on their own shelves.

The trust mechanism: Registration and a status page raise the cost of a throwaway account — but the real fix is renters linking a bank account so the remaining deposit auto-deducts if a book isn't returned. Trust isn't hoped for; it's enforced by the system itself.

Where it stands: Live and hosted, but not yet fully functional. Content redesign planned next.

The problem: Nepal's book rental options are a weekly library rate (200–500 NPR) or an annual membership (~1,000 NPR) — neither fits how people actually read.

"Most people, myself included, don't finish a book in a week — that's skimming, not reading."

The model: A deposit (200–250 NPR) that decreases ~50 NPR per week held — a month of reading costs close to what a library charges for one week, and lets people earn from unused books on their own shelves.

The trust mechanism: Registration and a status page raise the cost of a throwaway account — but the real fix is renters linking a bank account so the remaining deposit auto-deducts if a book isn't returned. Trust isn't hoped for; it's enforced by the system itself.

Where it stands: Live and hosted, but not yet fully functional. Content redesign planned next.

Challenge

Challenge: Renting a book in Nepal usually means one of two bad options: pay a library's weekly rate — typically 200 to 500 rupees — or commit to an annual membership around 1,000 rupees. Neither fits how people actually read. Most people, myself included, don't finish a book in a week; that's skimming, not reading. And almost nobody reads enough in a year to justify an annual fee for the sake of renting one or two books. Meanwhile, a lot of books just sit unused on shelves after someone's read them once — value going to waste on both sides of the transaction.

Solution

I designed a deposit-based rental model instead of a flat fee: put down a small deposit — 200 to 250 rupees — and it's cut down by about 50 rupees a week for as long as the book is held. In practice, someone reading at a normal pace can hold a book for a month for close to what a library charges for a single week. On the other side, it lets people with unused books on their shelves earn something from them instead of letting them sit there indefinitely.

Handing a personal book to a stranger only works if the lender can trust it'll come back. I designed this as a layered system, not a single fix: registration requires real information and a mandatory phone number, which raises the cost of creating a throwaway account, and a status page shows exactly where a rental stands. But the piece that actually matters most is that renters can link a bank account so the remaining deposit is deducted automatically if the book isn't returned — that removes trust as something the system has to hope for, and replaces it with something the system enforces on its own. The phone number and status page support that; the auto-deduction is what actually makes it work.


Impact

The site is built and hosted live, but the product itself isn't fully functional yet — worth stating plainly rather than implying otherwise. A content redesign is planned as the next step.